Charters, "normal process" versus ISOC, etc. (was: Re

[Margaret Wasserman]

Hi James,

At 08:55 AM 5/21/2003 -0700, James Kempf wrote:
>I don't think this is a valid assumption. There are several people who
>have served on IAB or IESG in the far enough distant past that they
>would be credible candidates, and some who would be excellent based on
>other qualities.

Given that people who were there at the time have indicated that most
of these problems have existed in the IETF for at least 10 years, how
could you reasonably claim that any IAB/IESG member who has served in the
last ten years is any less culpable than current IAB/IESG members?

Margaret