Please get it done

[Brian E Carpenter]

Mark Allman wrote:
> 
> > >Let's get it done, rather the repeating the arguments yet again.
> >
> > I like this approach.
> 
> me too
> 
> > Should we just trust the Nomcom to pick the right person, or
> > should we offer some suggestions regarding the "independence"
> > criteria and "neutrality" that some have suggested is important to
> > maintaining the credibility of the process?
> >
> > Do we specifically want someone who has never served on the I*?
> > Or at least not in the last 10 years, since everyone seems to
> > agree that some of the problems have existed at least that long?
> >
> > And are there particular qualifications for this position, such
> > as experience with process management and process improvement?
> 
> My hit is that we should leave it to nomcom.  I generally give
> nomcom input on particular cnadidates, but also on particular
> skills/traits I am interested in.  I'd say we can all funnel our own
> feelings to nomcom and we should not have a lengthy debate on what
> those should be.  (The most advice I'd want to give nomcom would be:
> please solicit input on the skills/traits that are important, not
> just on candidates.  But, I assume they know that already.)
>

Yes, I assume Nomcom would make their usual open call for
nominations, and that gives everybody the chance to provide
input.

   Brian