OPEN ISSUE: Appeals Path

[Dave Crocker]

Margaret,


MW> I think that a well-defined appeals process is needed for any
MW> activity the size and scope of the proposed Improvement WG.

There is no higher appeal than the IETF Plenary.

Worrying about invoking "normal" appeals processes entirely misses the
nature of this IETF change effort.

This effort is not a typical technical specification effort, so let's
not pretend that it must conform to our typical working group process.



d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>