OPEN ISSUE: Standards Track

[Bilel Jamoussi]

This highlights the need for 'mandatory' training that new ADs and WG chairs
have to go through before they assume their duty.


--------------------------
bnj


-----Original Message-----
From: Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com <Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com>
To: kempf at docomolabs-usa.com <kempf at docomolabs-usa.com>;
problem-statement at alvestrand.no <problem-statement at alvestrand.no>;
mrw at windriver.com <mrw at windriver.com>
Sent: Fri May 16 15:41:38 2003
Subject: RE: OPEN ISSUE:  Standards Track

> > For example, I think that it should be possible for several
> different
> > proposals that solve the same problem to be published in an enduring
> > form by the IETF, and for a subsequent process to determine which
> > one(s) will advance on the standards-track.  This would solve some
> > of the problems that we have in the v6ops WG, for example.  But, we
> > have no tools to do this in a way that makes the status of these
> > documents visible to our "customers".
> >
> 
> My understanding is that that is one purpose of the Experimental
> designation.

Which unfortunately I believe is not done as much by WGs in the
IETF. 
> 
>         jak

-bp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/problem-statement/attachments/20030516/d24ea164/attachment.htm