OPEN ISSUE: Nomcom Process

[john.loughney at nokia.com]

Hi Brian,

> I would add that this was discussed *extensively* in the
> current nomcom WG and there was no consensus to publish
> the names.
> 
> I would suggest that it would be ironic if the problem-statement
> WG were to commit the sin of re-discussing a solution that another
> WG has recently discussed and abandoned.

Then maybe the document should just say this was discuss under
nomcom WG and no consensus was reached (i.e. - it is not part of
this WG's charter).

John