OPEN ISSUE: Standards Track

[Keith Moore]

> When documents are reviewed, it would be useful if we could
> get two types of (clearly delineated) feedback:
> 
>          (1) Blocking issues that would prevent the publication
>                  of the document at PS.  In the opinion of the
>                  reviewer (currently the IESG), it is worth
>                  delaying publication of the document to fix
>                  this problem.
>          (2) Non-blocking issues that should be fixed in the
>                  next revision (and certainly before the
>                  document goes to the next stage).

as long as implementors feel free to widely deploy PS protocols, the
two are nearly indistinguishable.