OPEN ISSUE: Quality Process WG Charter

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand]

--On 15. mai 2003 18:57 +0300 john.loughney at nokia.com wrote:


>> >     [OPEN ISSUE: Should the Problem Statement WG propose a charter for
>> >     this group, or leave that to the General AD and selected chair(s)?]
>>
>>
>> I think that developing a charter for this group should be
>> done by the ADs and chair(s), probably through the normal
>> BOF process.
>
> I agree with you on this.

timing issue.....

is the creation of the Quality WG dependent on IETF consensus on the 
Problem and Process documentson this WG?
If yes - the WG cannot be started until after Vienna.
If no - the WG process can be started as soon as there appears to be 
reasonable consensus that the WG should be formed. It seems reasonable to 
expect that the WG could start before this WG produces its final output.

identity issue....

is this WG in parallel to, in cooperation with, or orthogonal to, the 
proposal to form a WG (that is, an activity with a charter) focusing on 
training/education/leader development for the IETF?