WG / documentation question
john.loughney at nokia.com
john.loughney at nokia.com
Thu May 8 17:43:07 CEST 2003
Hi Avri,
> I am not sure what you mean by unbounded. If you mean that one does not
> know the termination point before it is reached, then I don't agree with
> you. On the other hand if you mean a looping conversation then I do.
Looping conversations are one example, or another example is a thread/topic
that just dies & there seem to be no summary or conclusion reached ...
> > I understand you want to listen, but it would be helpful to be
> > 'managing' the discussion, trying to summarize long threads, making
> > conclusions, etc.
>
> This is an interesting issue. As has been mentioned on several
> occasions there are different styles of chairing. I think that
> they range from micro management to exception management. I tend away
> from micro management and do not believe in curtailing or trying to
> shape the dialogue except for when it strays to far from the charter;
> i.e. basically a form of exception management. But I do
> admit to being very liberal in what I accept as being on topic.
I'm a big proponent of trying to reach some conclusions and those
conclusions be explicitly stated, even if it is simply repeating
that what everyone knows. I have found that trying to repeat
/ summarize what people are saying tends to either clarify the
result or indicate that what I or others thought was a conclusion
was not the same thing that others thought.
John
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list