My thoughts about the problems of the IETF

[Bound, Jim]

Meeting minutes are work a lot of work esp for the minute taker.  The
IESG should just do a better job here.  They don't do it well and they
should.  Is there anymore to say?
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu] 
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 5:02 PM
> To: Jonne.Soininen at nokia.com
> Cc: harald at alvestrand.no; moore at cs.utk.edu; 
> problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: My thoughts about the problems of the IETF
> 
> 
> > I agree that they are better
> > than nothing, but they can hardly be even considered as meeting 
> > minutes. They tend to list only the results of the meeting but no 
> > actual discussions.
> 
> well, any actual objections to protocol actions have to be 
> written up, rather than merely mentioned in a telechat, in 
> order to have any effect.  and those are now available in the 
> tracking system.
> 
> it may be that IESG meetings are more boring than you thought.
> 
> > In addition, what I would like to see is also the
> > IESG meeting agendas (before the meetings), and the meeting 
> calendar.
> 
> I doubt it would be difficult or controversial to provide 
> either one. but again, the document tracker pretty much 
> provides these things already. 
> 
> Keith
>