The "late surprise" problem

[Bound, Jim]

I think this idea can cause more problems, unless done in formal way.
I would also like to see serious qualifications listed and the person
would have to meet those qualifications.  Those qualifications should be
open to wide IETF input.  I would input one right now and this is 1/2 of
them be implementors and implementor can be defined later.

Another way to do this is use the IEEE process.

/jim

 


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian at hursley.ibm.com] 
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:40 AM
>To: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
>Subject: The "late surprise" problem
>
>
>Actually this is a solution proposal, which Dave Crocker and I 
>have been discussing the last couple of days. I think it has 
>value, and it also illustrates what I think we have to do - 
>find subsets of the total problem for which we can rapidly 
>implement incremental solutions.
>
>   Brian
>