Problem statement draft comments

[Aaron Falk]

In the interests of collecting real data, it might be useful for
someone to volunteer to collect, from the wg chairs, and post a single
snapshot of mailing list sizes for all working groups.

--aaron

Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> 
> I don't have any numbers on mailing list size, but the IPv6 WG
> is usually the most heavily attended WG, according to blue sheet
> signatures.  IPv6 usually has 400+ signatures on the blue sheets
> (with considerably more people than that in the room), while the
> next largest WGs usually run in the mid-to-high 200s.
> 
> Margaret
> 
> 
> At 10:27 AM 3/10/2003 -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
> >> Is your experience tilted more towards lists that are (1) at the
> >> application level, and (2) not telephony/SubIP-related?
> >
> >yes.  apparently I was under the mistaken impression that some of the
> >apps groups (e.g. those related to web things) were the largest ones
> >in IETF...
> >
> >Keith
>