MIXER example (mailing list size/activity)

[Spencer Dawkins]

I'm trying to limit my forays into solution space, so, to try to
phrase it as a problem discussion - how often DOES IESG
(together or individually) look at working group progress?

Spencer

p.s. I can't judge the frequency of
IESG-stall-plus-blame-the-working-group, but this seems equally
likely whether we zero-charter or
manage-slow-working-groups-by-exception...

--- Eric Rosen <erosen at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> > Ummm, I suppose zero-based chartering (IESG decides what WGs
> to
> > KEEP after every meeting) is out of the question? 
> 
> Revisiting  every decision  three times  a  year is  not the 
> way to  ensure
> progress or to improve quality.   This is like Dilbert's boss
> saying "you're
> way behind schedule, so now I'll be needing hourly status
> reports." 
> 
> Note  also  that a  recalcitrant  IESG  member  can
> deliberately  delay  the
> progress of a WG, and then claim that the progress is too
> slow.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com