General comment on draft-ietf-problem-statement-00.txt

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Mon Mar 3 07:02:47 CET 2003


> Aren't we basically saying that the problem is:
> 
>   Too high a proportion of the documents considered by the IESG
>   contain serious problems, detected very late in the review process.
> 
> So, the IESG is doing its job (detecting and kicking back faulty
> documents) but it doesn't scale because too many of them require
> too much attention.
> 
> Another problem statement is
> 
>   Document quality control early in the WG process allows too high
>   a proportion of documents to proceed with serious problems.

dunno about "we" but that sure says it for me
  o weak product from wg
  o poor wg review
  o no ietf-wide review
  o iesg gets to deal with emperor's lack of attire and is
    therefore considered rude

randy



More information about the Problem-statement mailing list