General comment on draft-ietf-problem-statement-00.txt
    Randy Bush 
    randy at psg.com
       
    Mon Mar  3 07:02:47 CET 2003
    
    
  
> Aren't we basically saying that the problem is:
> 
>   Too high a proportion of the documents considered by the IESG
>   contain serious problems, detected very late in the review process.
> 
> So, the IESG is doing its job (detecting and kicking back faulty
> documents) but it doesn't scale because too many of them require
> too much attention.
> 
> Another problem statement is
> 
>   Document quality control early in the WG process allows too high
>   a proportion of documents to proceed with serious problems.
dunno about "we" but that sure says it for me
  o weak product from wg
  o poor wg review
  o no ietf-wide review
  o iesg gets to deal with emperor's lack of attire and is
    therefore considered rude
randy
    
    
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list