General comment on draft-ietf-problem-statement-00.txt
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Mar 3 07:02:47 CET 2003
> Aren't we basically saying that the problem is:
>
> Too high a proportion of the documents considered by the IESG
> contain serious problems, detected very late in the review process.
>
> So, the IESG is doing its job (detecting and kicking back faulty
> documents) but it doesn't scale because too many of them require
> too much attention.
>
> Another problem statement is
>
> Document quality control early in the WG process allows too high
> a proportion of documents to proceed with serious problems.
dunno about "we" but that sure says it for me
o weak product from wg
o poor wg review
o no ietf-wide review
o iesg gets to deal with emperor's lack of attire and is
therefore considered rude
randy
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list