Listing affiliations
Bob Hinden
hinden at IPRG.nokia.com
Thu Jun 26 10:22:58 CEST 2003
Leslie,
At 05:46 AM 6/26/2003, Leslie Daigle wrote:
>Bob,
>
>I do have an item on my "to do" list to take this up with the IAB.
Thanks.
>I will observe that there are at least 3 different theories
>at play:
>
> . the community wants to know what companies are supporting
> the people on the iab/iesg
>
> . the employers (for those of us fortunate enough to have them)
> of the people on the iab/iesg would like some recognition of the
> fact they are contributing employee resources
>
> . we are all contributing as individuals (still)
I think these are all true and don't think they are conflicting.
>It's the latter point that has caused IAB members *not* to be introduced
>with affiliations at plenaries, and the affiliations not to be posted
>on the IAB web page.
I don't have a strong view if IAB members should be introduced in the
plenary with their affiliations. I don't think it is necessary as long as
their affiliations are publicly available (e.g., on the IAB web page). I
don't see any harm if it was done either.
>A couple or few years ago, I suggested it would be helpful to have
>brief statement (or web page) about/from each IAB member, linked
>off the IAB member listing page, so that people could have a clue what areas
>of interest/expertise the various IAB members have. It strikes
>me that would be an appropriate place to list affiliations.
I think short bio's for IESG and IAB members would be nice for the reasons
you state. My preference for this would be in addition to a listing of
name and affiliation.
>You can see how well the idea flew the last time I proposed it.
>
>I do have an item on my "to do" list to take this up with the IAB.
Thanks,
Bob
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list