rough consensus (was Re: "trouble maker")
avri at acm.org
Thu Jun 26 22:16:05 CEST 2003
This has been a very interesting discussion, and I beleive that
it is important that the details of this issue be debated and resolved.
I do not believe that should be done on this list. It was good to get
the problem discussed so that people could do an abstraction of it
for the problem statement, but I would like to avoid dwelling on the
specific arguments relating to it any longer.
At this point I ask that people concentrate on the general language
for the problem statement so that we can make sure that the problem
is reflected adequately in the problem statement.
On torsdag, jun 26, 2003, at 13:45 Asia/Seoul, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
More information about the Problem-statement