"trouble maker"

[Keith Moore]

very much in agreement.

Keith

> For example, I've seen exactly what
> you describe (repeated re-opening of closed issues) and I
> think that if WG chairs refuse allow decisions to be
> revisited without new information or a new argument being 
> presented that problem can be addressed without
> fundamentally re-engineering human nature.  I'd strongly
> prefer to see this problem you're describing, which I
> absolutely agree is a problem, framed in terms of the IETF
> rather than in terms of the individual.