The need for smaller protocol specifications
randy at psg.com
Tue Jun 10 18:37:39 CEST 2003
> 1. Bob Hinden suggested an idea for time to market. Not one IESG
> person said this is a good idea not as IESG person but folks who have
> IESG experience.
'timely' was one of the ajdectives in the terse iesg statement of the
> 2. Charlie gives below I think accurate description at a minimum a
> problem we face. Again no IESG response here.
a formal iesg response would take two years as it would have to pass
iab and isoc review :-)
and, by now you will have seen a number of responses. folk are just
busy. e.g., i was on a plane over the pacific. patience, guy.
i think harald said it well, and i will paraphrase. yes, protocols
often get far too complex. but the way charlie phrases the issue
could much more easily be used for things i would not support than
for things i would.
More information about the Problem-statement