Trusting the IESG to manage the reform
process(was:Re:DoingtheRight Things?)
john.loughney at nokia.com
john.loughney at nokia.com
Mon Jun 9 11:22:22 CEST 2003
Hi Randy,
> i am still unsure, but think basically agree. so let me pick nits
> before getting some sleep.
>
> > If it matters, I believe two major core problems are
> > 1) producing quality documents
>
> s/documents/standards for the internet/
>
> as i am not sure all we produce is the documents, and i think
> we need to keep our focus on the internet.
Well, at the end of the day, they are documents, but perhaps
'documents & standards for the Internet' would be fine.
> note that the iesg mission statement from london also included
> 'relevant,' another easy to measure criterion :-).
Relevant is fairly fuzzy, I agree.
> > 2) solving current scaling problems
>
> how about 'the scaling problems we understand today,' or something
> like that, as we would like what we do to last a while?
Agreed.
> > and to add a third:
> > 3) producing timely documents (this has relations to 1 & 2).
>
> yup. but, as hta points out, there are subtilties here.
Agreed & I was exactly thinking of that when I suggested the third
point. Thinking a bit more on this topic, timeliness is a dimension
which is often overlooked in our work. In otherwords, we should have
some sense of what the target is of our work.
John
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list