Suggesting document fixes (Re: pausable explanation for the Document Series)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand harald at
Sat Jun 7 10:49:35 CEST 2003

--On fredag, juni 06, 2003 09:00:16 -0700 Charlie Perkins 
<charliep at> wrote:

>> This is the problem statement WG, not the problem resolution WG.
>> Our job is to identify problems, not to argue over the merits of
>> solutions that haven't even been outlined yet.  We have a identified
>> a problem that our standards maturity levels do not match with
>> either industry expectations or IETF energies.  Do you agree with
>> that problem statement or not?
> Yes.  I agree with the statement.

Charlie, Keith:

Since you have something you agree on, and which I agree on too, and which 
I cannot find in the problem-statement document as currently written, 
perhaps the two of you could try to formulate a proposal for a change to 
the problem-statement document that incorporates this point, and which 
Melinda can track as an "issue to be resolved"?

Unless we capture the agreement, it might become lost again....


More information about the Problem-statement mailing list