Fixed font v multiple fonts
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
pbaker at verisign.com
Thu Jul 10 08:35:02 CEST 2003
Lars does not have the right to impose his decision on me.
As for rough consensus, the PROBLEM I am identifying is that there is simply
no forum where the majority of the membership can give their views on the
matter.
I am raising it as a problem because it was raised as one of the reasons why
a group of prominent engineers want to propose changes to SMTP, MIME and
S/MIME outside of IETF process.
It is certainly not the most important, but it is the easiest one to fix.
I would have thought that the near certainty that the Internet standards are
going to be forked would be a concern to this group. Obviously I was wrong,
you would all much rather run a debating society with no influence where you
are in absolute control.
Phill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Seng [mailto:jseng at pobox.org.sg]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:41 AM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: 'Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)'; Keith Moore;
> problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: Fixed font v multiple fonts
>
>
> I guess when the rough consensus is not going your way, it is
> "top-down
> decision". Hello??
>
> Lars have his rights to his opinion as much as you do.
>
> -James Seng
>
> > I have never spent half as much time getting a document
> format right as I
> > have for the IETF. Even the W3C rules for HTML are not as
> much hassle.
> >
> > Again, the issue is who gets to decide.
>
>
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list