Draft Charter

Elwyn Davies elwynd at nortelnetworks.com
Mon Jan 27 20:19:05 CET 2003


Hi.

I would also be more comfortable with John's wording on root causes.

Elwyn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: john.loughney at nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney at nokia.com]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 19:07
> To: avri at apocalypse.org; problem-statement at alvestrand.no;
> harald at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: Draft Charter
> 
> 
> Hi Avri,
> 
> Some comments:
> 
> > This group is charged with producing the document describing these
> > problems.  The analysis of the problem should deliver the 
> root causes of
> > the problems as well as the perceived derivative problems.
> 
> I'm not sure we can 'deliver the root causes' in a short time frame,
> I think we should try to get at the root causes, but at lease document
> what we can.  I'd suggest:
> 
>   The analysis of the problem should seek out the root causes of
>   the problems as well as the perceived derivative problems.
> 
> 
> > Goals and Milestones:
> > 
> > Jan 03 Group formed
> > Feb 03 First I-D of problem statement issued
> > Mar 03 Problem statement reviewed at the IESG Plenary
> > Mar 03 First I-D of process proposal issued
> > May 03 Problem statement submitted for IESG review
> > Jul 03 Process proposal reviewed at the IESG Plenary
> > Aug 03 Process proposal submitted for IESG review
> > Oct 03 Re-charter or close working group
> 
> Should we give more time to this: First I-D of process 
> proposal issued?
> I think we should wait until the Problem Statement is stable before
> working on a process proposal.
> 
> br,
> John
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/problem-statement/attachments/20030127/326fb327/attachment.htm


More information about the Problem-statement mailing list