elwynd at nortelnetworks.com
Mon Jan 27 20:19:05 CET 2003
I would also be more comfortable with John's wording on root causes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: john.loughney at nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney at nokia.com]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 19:07
> To: avri at apocalypse.org; problem-statement at alvestrand.no;
> harald at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: Draft Charter
> Hi Avri,
> Some comments:
> > This group is charged with producing the document describing these
> > problems. The analysis of the problem should deliver the
> root causes of
> > the problems as well as the perceived derivative problems.
> I'm not sure we can 'deliver the root causes' in a short time frame,
> I think we should try to get at the root causes, but at lease document
> what we can. I'd suggest:
> The analysis of the problem should seek out the root causes of
> the problems as well as the perceived derivative problems.
> > Goals and Milestones:
> > Jan 03 Group formed
> > Feb 03 First I-D of problem statement issued
> > Mar 03 Problem statement reviewed at the IESG Plenary
> > Mar 03 First I-D of process proposal issued
> > May 03 Problem statement submitted for IESG review
> > Jul 03 Process proposal reviewed at the IESG Plenary
> > Aug 03 Process proposal submitted for IESG review
> > Oct 03 Re-charter or close working group
> Should we give more time to this: First I-D of process
> proposal issued?
> I think we should wait until the Problem Statement is stable before
> working on a process proposal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Problem-statement