Perceived consensus on Problem Doc

[Keith Moore]

On Dec 3, 2003, at 9:23 AM, Avri Doria wrote:

> After reviewing the issues brought up during the 2nd Last Call on this 
> document the co-chairs believe that there were no issues related to 
> those brought up in the 1st Last Call  brought up that warrant going 
> though another editing cycle on this document.  We believe that at 
> this time there is rough consensus for passing the document on to the 
> General Area AD for IESG consideration.

Well, I believe you're wrong about that, and I specifically object to 
the chairs' moving this document forward without due consideration of 
Last Call comments.

As it seems a bit ridiculous to appeal to IESG an action to send a 
document to IESG that IESG probably feels it can't really object to 
(since it criticizes IESG), I'm somewhat at a loss as to what to do 
next, but I believe this action is highly inappropriate, and it calls 
this entire WG's output into doubt.