My thoughts about the problems of the IETF
Eric Rosen
erosen at cisco.com
Thu Apr 17 17:02:58 CEST 2003
Scott> if a AD/IESG pushback to a WG for a security or danger-to-the-net
Scott> issue can not get WG consus to fix then we are in a pile of problem
The problem here is that "danger-to-the-net" is often a matter of opinion,
not purely a technical issue. Some people wield the "danger-to-the-net"
slogan the way Nixon wielded "national security", to try to shut down
anything they don't approve of for one reason or another.
Scott> if the AD says that and the WG specifically has consensus a different
Scott> way that it would be a process violation to override the WG consensus
Even if the WG is just an "ignorant mob", to paraphrase a frequent
contributor to this list ;-) If someone mounted an appeal on the grounds
that the AD had ignored WG consensus, the AD would just pull out the
"danger-to-the-net" excuse.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list