My thoughts about the problems of the IETF
James Kempf
kempf at docomolabs-usa.com
Thu Apr 17 10:28:21 CEST 2003
> You are greatly overestimating the efficacy of the appeals process.
It is
> possible for an AD (or the IESG as a whole) to make decisions
which are
> arbitrary, capricious, ignorant, prejudiced,or just blatantly
political, and
> as long as there is no formal violation of process, there is no
way to
> appeal.
>
There seems to be a common misconception in IETF that people can't
appeal a WG or IESG decision based on technical grounds. RFC 2026 is
quite clear that this is possible. Section 6.5.2 has this to say about
appeals:
An individual (whether a participant in the relevant Working Group or
not) may disagree with a Working Group recommendation based on his or
her belief that either (a) his or her own views have not been
adequately considered by the Working Group, or (b) the Working Group
has made an incorrect technical choice which places the quality
and/or integrity of the Working Group's product(s) in significant
jeopardy. The first issue is a difficulty with Working Group
process; the latter is an assertion of technical error. These two
types of disagreement are quite different, but both are handled by
the same process of review.
The RFC then goes on to describe the appeal process.
jak
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list