Info/exptl RFCs [Re: Killing old/slow groups - transition thinking

[RJ Atkinson]

On Tuesday, Dec 10, 2002, at 08:14 America/Montreal, Brian E Carpenter 
wrote:
> So, one can ask why ISOC should fund the publication of any RFC
> that was *not* approved for publication by the IETF (currently
> represented by the IESG) as part of the standards process.

An obvious example:
	Because IRTF is under IAB (not under IESG), hence indirectly under 
ISoc,
regularly publishes very useful technical documents, and does not ever
publish its documents "as part of the standards process".


Ran