Review for media types: application/ibe-pp-data, application/ibe-key-request+xml, and application/ibe-pkg-reply+xml
Turner, Sean P.
turners at ieca.com
Mon Sep 29 21:35:21 CEST 2008
I'll forward these to the author.
spt
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mark at coactus.com [mailto:mark at coactus.com] On Behalf Of
>Mark Baker
>Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 3:31 PM
>To: Turner, Sean P.
>Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes; ietf-types at iana.org
>Subject: Re: Review for media types: application/ibe-pp-data,
>application/ibe-key-request+xml, and application/ibe-pkg-reply+xml
>
>The section references in 8.1 are incorrect. They should be
>4.3, 5.4, and 5.7 respectively.
>
>- the additional information section is for magic numbers and
>file extensions. Please refer to the registration template in
>RFC 4288.
>
>- parameters, both optional and mandatory, aren't explicitly
>named (at least in an obvious way) and only described.
>
>- as an observation, the mandatory parameters for
>application/ibe-key-request+xml and
>application/ibe-pkg-reply+xml both seem to be message control
>data rather than representation metadata, so this seems a
>misuse of the media type framework. Is it too late to fix this?
>
>Mark.
>
>On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Turner, Sean P.
><turners at ieca.com> wrote:
>> There was another update:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-ibearch-08.txt
More information about the Ietf-types
mailing list