Review for media types: application/ibe-pp-data, application/ibe-key-request+xml, and application/ibe-pkg-reply+xml

Turner, Sean P. turners at ieca.com
Mon Sep 29 21:35:21 CEST 2008


I'll forward these to the author.

spt 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: mark at coactus.com [mailto:mark at coactus.com] On Behalf Of 
>Mark Baker
>Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 3:31 PM
>To: Turner, Sean P.
>Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes; ietf-types at iana.org
>Subject: Re: Review for media types: application/ibe-pp-data, 
>application/ibe-key-request+xml, and application/ibe-pkg-reply+xml
>
>The section references in 8.1 are incorrect.  They should be 
>4.3, 5.4, and 5.7 respectively.
>
>- the additional information section is for magic numbers and 
>file extensions.  Please refer to the registration template in 
>RFC 4288.
>
>- parameters, both optional and mandatory, aren't explicitly 
>named (at least in an obvious way) and only described.
>
>- as an observation, the mandatory parameters for 
>application/ibe-key-request+xml and 
>application/ibe-pkg-reply+xml both seem to be message control 
>data rather than representation metadata, so this seems a 
>misuse of the media type framework.  Is it too late to fix this?
>
>Mark.
>
>On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Turner, Sean P. 
><turners at ieca.com> wrote:
>> There was another update:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-ibearch-08.txt



More information about the Ietf-types mailing list