proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Mark Baker
distobj at acm.org
Fri Dec 19 18:24:29 CET 2003
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 12:20:01AM +0900, MURATA Makoto wrote:
> However, even in this case, I
> am sympathetic to Martin's worry ("we start to get into a patchwork").
> In all other cases, I do not want to allow omission of the charset
> parameter. How do others feel?
Do we know that all existing application/*+xml types define the charset
param by reference to 3023? If so, then I agree; I believe that the
benefit of this simplification outweighs the cost of (potential)
redundancy.
Mark.
--
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
More information about the Ietf-types
mailing list