Michael Everson everson at
Sat Jan 7 18:18:56 CET 2017

On 6 Jan 2017, at 19:03, Peter Constable <petercon at> wrote:
> While I agree with most of your response to Michael, I still don’t think the “t” extension should be extended for this as it is not a transform, and I’m still not totally convinced that the correct solution _for a generalized case_ of code switching, extensive borrowing, or other contact-language scenarios is to capture everything in a single tag.

I don’t think a generative mechanism for hooking up languages for this scenario makes sense at all. The number of actual contact languages is small enough. It’s rare to find books or other materials in them. 


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list