cowan at ccil.org
Sat Jan 7 00:51:16 CET 2017
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com>
I’m not sure that is necessarily true. One scenario is Hinglish where the
> English bits are mostly technical words. One need not fully understand
> English to be able to use “Internet” and other technical words – though one
> would have to understand that subset of English.
That's exactly the difference between code-switching and mere heavy
borrowing, as in my "French in its purity" example. The first text is
English-French code-switching, whereas the second is French that happens
(because of its content) to have a lot of recent English loan-words. The
Angloromani example is likewise English with Romany borrowings.
John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Winter: MIT, / Keio, INRIA, / Issue lots of Drafts.
So much more to understand! / Might simplicity return?
(A "tanka", or extended haiku)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages