request for subtag for Elfdalian

Michael Everson everson at
Tue Mar 8 13:51:50 CET 2016

On 8 Mar 2016, at 01:49, Martin J. Dürst <duerst at> wrote:

>> What should happen? Should we include paradigm tables? A description of the historical phonology?
> Probably not. But an explanatory sentence and a pointer might be appropriate, if we want to point them to the fact that they should (re?)consider the linguistic side of things.

The current draft mentions these things. Though some of Doug’s arguments pointing out plainly that it isn’t 639-3’s job to worry about standardization levels might be valuable. 

Michael Everson *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list