Proposed record for 'fonnapa'
doug at ewellic.org
Thu Jun 9 23:50:40 CEST 2016
John Cowan wrote:
> It pretty much has to be. It's used for hundreds of languages in North
> America, and variants of it (so saith Wikipedia) for Slavic, Indic,
> Semitic, Caucasian, and some Uralic languages, plus Proto-Indo-
Michael Everson wrote:
> It’s necessary for those.
I realize this. I'm just mentioning it in case someone reviews the form
and thinks we overlooked something.
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
More information about the Ietf-languages