andrew.dunning at utoronto.ca
Sat Feb 27 13:34:44 CET 2016
I was waiting to see whether there were any objections to the premise of having variant tags for this in the first place; I am not concerned about what they are named. Going off the model of the English variants (e.g. emodeng), I might suggest something like this:
- Classical Latin = la-classlat
- Medieval Latin = la-medlat
- Neo-Latin = la-neolat
I will write up separate forms for these if this seems desirable.
> On 27 Feb 2016, at 1:47 am, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
> Yes, I expected a follow-up. Dan showed that what was submitted was not actionable.
>> On 26 Feb 2016, at 23:00, John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
>> Doug Ewell scripsit:
>>> Other than splitting the requests into three separate forms, and finding
>>> a 5- to 8-letter replacement for 'neo', does everyone agree with these
>>> proposals and we just wait for Michael to approve them after two weeks,
>> I thought your objections were cogent, and I figured the requester would
>> resubmit something that respected them.
>> John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
>> Go, and never darken my towels again!
>> --Rufus T. Firefly
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages