Fire the programmer (was: Re: Appeal to ISO 639 RA in support of Elfdalian)
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Fri Apr 29 20:15:22 CEST 2016
Shawn Steele scripsit:
> IMO, if 5 letter codes, or any codes that break existing patterns,
> are ever defined, we'd better have a really good reason.
By that token, we'd still be back in the pure "xx-yy" era. And for many
purposes that's plenty, but for some it definitely isn't, which is why
this group has moved on. I still find myself catching specs that insist on
"xx-yy" as the one true format for language tags.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the sound of a [Ww]all that people
have stopped banging their head against? --Larry
More information about the Ietf-languages