Appeal to ISO 639 RA in support of Elfdalian
doug at ewellic.org
Fri Apr 22 18:09:25 CEST 2016
Peter Constable wrote:
> The RA has an established process. Are we trying to by-pass it under
> the threat of creating a subtag that could create future conflicts? Is
> the RA to by-pass established process for anybody that can present a
> sufficient risk to overall good?
Let's send the appeal. It can't hurt anything. Then, if the RA says no,
or if they say "we'll keep looking into it" but we are dissatisfied with
their time frame, at that point we can discuss registering a 5+ letter
subtag (we really need a good name for such things).
I remain unconvinced that a 5+ letter subtag would be such a terrible
option. We did build the mechanism into BCP 47, with lots of caveats
about how it would only be used in rare, exceptional circumstances.
Well, here we are; I've never seen a debate like this in 15 years on
I also remain unconvinced that the urgency is all that great, on the
order of months, but I suspect the RA has no urgency at all to give
Elfdalian a solid "yes" or "no" verdict. If we followed the normal
schedule, the results would probably be the same, so we may as well get
to the end game sooner.
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
More information about the Ietf-languages