Another attempt at plain language
everson at evertype.com
Fri Sep 4 10:12:20 CEST 2015
Specific and well-defined ones would be few and far between, I’d think.
> On 4 Sep 2015, at 07:01, Martin J. Dürst <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
> I would agree, and guess that many on this list would agree, that a specific and well-defined CNL would be in scope (mostly through a specific variant subtag registration) for BCP 47.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
More information about the Ietf-languages