Language Subtag Registration
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Fri Oct 30 16:31:26 CET 2015
Peter Constable scripsit:
> Kent, it seems to me that that would make the meaning of the subtag
> completely opaque, determined solely in a private context. In that case,
> a private-use tag would suffice.
I don't see that a tag "simple" would be opaque, just because there is no
single precise definition of it. There is no single precise definition of
>From Lytton Strachey's _Eminent Victorians_:
The members of the English Church had ingenuously imagined up
to that moment that it was possible to contain in a frame of
words the subtle essence of their complicated doctrinal system,
involving the mysteries of the Eternal and the Infinite on the
one hand, and the elaborate adjustments of temporal government
on the other. They did not understand that verbal definitions
in such a case will only perform their functions so long as
there is no dispute about the matters which they are intended
to define: that is to say, so long as there is no need for
them. For generations this had been the case with the Thirty-nine
Articles. Their drift was clear enough; and nobody bothered over
their exact meaning. But directly someone found it important to
give them a new and untraditional interpretation, it appeared
that they were a mass of ambiguity, and might be twisted into
meaning very nearly anything that anybody liked.
So it is with language tags: their drift is clear enough, and it is not
necessary to know their exact meaning. People who are going to abuse
them will do so anyway, whatever we say or do to try and stop them.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Sound change operates regularly to produce irregularities;
analogy operates irregularly to produce regularities.
--E.H. Sturtevant, ca. 1945, probably at Yale
More information about the Ietf-languages