Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com
Thu Nov 26 05:52:30 CET 2015
I was actually wondering about maybe a variant of und for some of these concepts? Some of the “English” based constructed languages diverge pretty far from English.
Or maybe a subtag to indicate constructed languages and then a list of possibilities after that?
From: David Starner [mailto:prosfilaes at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:16 PM
To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com>; ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages at iana.org>
Subject: Re: Pending requests
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:16 PM Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com<mailto:Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com>> wrote:
IMO that's different than a dialect such as en-US and en-GB.
There's a large number of formalized subsets of languages, which are generally characterized by being fully intelligible to speakers of the language of which they are a subset of. Even if they aren't exactly dialects, I don't see the point in labeling them as separate languages and trying to get them into ISO 693-3 instead of just tagging them here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages