prosfilaes at gmail.com
Thu Nov 26 05:15:50 CET 2015
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:16 PM Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com>
> IMO that's different than a dialect such as en-US and en-GB.
There's a large number of formalized subsets of languages, which are
generally characterized by being fully intelligible to speakers of the
language of which they are a subset of. Even if they aren't exactly
dialects, I don't see the point in labeling them as separate languages and
trying to get them into ISO 693-3 instead of just tagging them here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages