No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

[Peter Constable]

"Oedict" works even better IMO, but I recalled someone having some objection to _that_. Just pick anything, AFAIC.

Peter

Sent using OWA for iPad
________________________________________
From: Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 6:22:28 PM
To: Peter Constable; Shawn Steele; Phillips, Addison; Michael Everson; ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

–1
(sorry, Michael)

I don't see any advantage over 'oedict' or the others, and it would
invite mockery.

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Constable
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 16:16
To: Shawn Steele ; Phillips, Addison ; Michael Everson ; ietflang IETF
Languages Discussion
Subject: RE: No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

But Shawn's point is right: it's known as "OED". I suggest "oeddict" —
yes, there's redundancy, but so what. But I can live with anything.
These aren't end-user display strings after all.

Peter