No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

Doug Ewell doug at
Tue Mar 31 03:22:28 CEST 2015

(sorry, Michael)

I don't see any advantage over 'oedict' or the others, and it would 
invite mockery.

Doug Ewell | | Thornton, CO πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

-----Original Message----- 
From: Peter Constable
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 16:16
To: Shawn Steele ; Phillips, Addison ; Michael Everson ; ietflang IETF 
Languages Discussion
Subject: RE: No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

But Shawn's point is right: it's known as "OED". I suggest "oeddict" β€” 
yes, there's redundancy, but so what. But I can live with anything. 
These aren't end-user display strings after all.


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list