No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?
doug at ewellic.org
Tue Mar 31 03:22:28 CEST 2015
I don't see any advantage over 'oedict' or the others, and it would
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
From: Peter Constable
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 16:16
To: Shawn Steele ; Phillips, Addison ; Michael Everson ; ietflang IETF
Subject: RE: No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?
But Shawn's point is right: it's known as "OED". I suggest "oeddict" —
yes, there's redundancy, but so what. But I can live with anything.
These aren't end-user display strings after all.
More information about the Ietf-languages