Deprecating grandfathered tags redux
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Sat Mar 7 17:26:17 CET 2015
Phillips, Addison scripsit:
> However, I want to point out that using the existing "subtag"of Oxford
> is probably a good idea. If we change the subtag, the deprecation will
> cause existing tags to change when canonicalized. Making the existing
> subtag composable is also easier to explain. After all, we commonly
> say that the subtag itself doesn't matter.
I don't understand this. The existing subtag is 'oed', which is not a
valid variant subtag. 'Oxford' is only another proposal.
But, y'know, other than satisfying Mark Davis's rage for order :-),
I wonder what benefit is achieved by changing 'oed' at this point.
There are almost 2000 ghits for it, so knowledge about it has leaked out;
it is talked about, not just used for tagging.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Almost all theorems are true, but almost all proofs have bugs.
More information about the Ietf-languages