Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com
Tue Dec 15 01:54:54 CET 2015
I was out..... I like simple. I still don't like basiceng, however I suppose simple mitigates my concerns a little.
From: Ietf-languages [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: December 9, 2015 1:03 PM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages at iana.org>
Cc: Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni at mail.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: Pending requests
It’s my intention to approve “simple” for generic use (with misgivings) as well as “basiceng” as a specific form. I am not convinced that “ogden” is better, nor that people will confuse “basiceng” with “simple” since Wikipedia or VOA or whomever will certainly use the latter, and “basiceng” reflects the name of the specific form in question better than “ogden” does.
The forms for “basiceng” were submitted 29 October and it appears that there are no edits to be made. I will file the “simple” forms shortly.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages