No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?
"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Wed Apr 1 12:09:26 CEST 2015
On 2015/04/01 18:30, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
> If we can take care of that handful, then it allows them (their canonical
> equivalents) to be used in a wider range of software. That's the point of
> this entire exercise. We've managed to get consensus on all but:
> i-default, i-mingo, en-GB-oed
> And we appear to be close on en-GB-oed...
I think that there was quite a bit of consensus on the fact that it will
be extremely difficult (read: impossible) to get rid of, or replace,
More information about the Ietf-languages