No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

"Martin J. Dürst" duerst at
Wed Apr 1 12:09:26 CEST 2015

On 2015/04/01 18:30, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:

> If we can take care of that handful, then it allows them (their canonical
> equivalents) to be used in a wider range of software. That's the point of
> this entire exercise. We've managed to get consensus on all but:
> i-default, i-mingo, en-GB-oed
> And we appear to be close on en-GB-oed...

Hello Mark,

I think that there was quite a bit of consensus on the fact that it will 
be extremely difficult (read: impossible) to get rid of, or replace, 

Regards,   Martin.

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list