Proposed general model for Serbo-Croatian continuum
doug at ewellic.org
Fri Nov 22 15:25:24 CET 2013
John Cowan wrote:
> No no. What Doug doesn't like is the idea of explicitly specifying
> 'sr-Latn' and 'sr-Cyrl' as prefixes along with 'sr'. He says it's
> redundant, which is true: I just think the redundancy helps clarity
> in this case.
That, and I don't like the perception that -Latn and -Cyrl are
specifically being RECOMMENDED (§ 3.1.8) for use with these variant
subtags, when if anything, a script subtag would be *less* appropriate
with a variant that indicates pronunciation.
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA
http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell
More information about the Ietf-languages