Re: Descriptions for Volapük variants

Philip Newton philip.newton at
Tue Jan 17 21:39:42 CET 2012

2012/1/17 John Cowan <cowan at>:
> Doug Ewell scripsit:
>> I think the '1931' subtags are MUCH less mnemonic, and doubt that the
>> additional precision (if any) is really helpful for language tagging
>> purposes. I would much rather see rigik/nulik or jleyer/dejong or
>> schleyer/dejong.
> I strongly agree, and think that schleyer/dejong are far and away the best
> and clearest.

I agree.

Philip Newton <philip.newton at>

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list