Descriptions for Volapük variants
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Tue Jan 17 21:09:49 CET 2012
Doug Ewell scripsit:
> I think the '1931' subtags are MUCH less mnemonic, and doubt that the
> additional precision (if any) is really helpful for language tagging
> purposes. I would much rather see rigik/nulik or jleyer/dejong or
I strongly agree, and think that schleyer/dejong are far and away the best
> All of that said, I know basically zero Volapük, so that should be
> factored into any decisions about consensus.
Hardly anyone does, though there is now a Vükiped at vo.wikipedia.org.
Values of beeta will give rise to dom! John Cowan
(5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
to rename '.' or '..' entries; see cowan at ccil.org
More information about the Ietf-languages