pseudo-localization variants

[Peter Constable]

Um... it generally _is_ in a real language. Just orthographically different.

Peter


Sent from Windows Mail

From: Michael Everson
Sent: ‎December‎ ‎18‎, ‎2012 ‎11‎:‎00‎ ‎AM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: pseudo-localization variants

You have und, mis, and zxx available. You're tagging the language content, not the usage scenario. if the text isn't in a real language, then it should be Undetermined, Uncoded, no have no real Linguistic Content.

I doubt we'd want a code for glossolalia either apart from und, mis, or zxx.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20121219/ab94d2a7/attachment.html>