proposed ISO 639 change for "arn"

Michael Everson everson at
Tue Dec 11 21:40:16 CET 2012

On 11 Dec 2012, at 19:42, Doug Ewell <doug at> wrote:

> It isn't possible to have the collection vs. macrolanguage discussion, nor to understand why "macrolanguage" would be a poor choice for Mapudungun, without understanding this.

Essentially it doesn't matter, because either way "arn" is being shifted upward in the tree and a new code would be assigned to the leaf called Mapudungun. If "collection" is better, grand.

Michael Everson *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list