ISO 639-3 2011 changes: ikt

[Doug Ewell]

Philip Newton wrote:

> My main concern was that the proposed change in the registry did not
> seem to represent accurately the change that ISO 639 made, but that
> appears to have been based on a misunderstanding on my part. (Perhaps
> the "summary of changes" was not quite as clear as it could have been
> about the effect of this particular change, or perhaps I'm simply not
> used to the format it uses to indicate such changes.) Thank you for
> the clarification.

I think the RA's explanation of their disposition is not merely unclear, 
but erroneous—​though, again, it has little or no impact on the 
Registry.

Thanks for reading the posted Registry changes carefully.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell ­