deprecated subtag 'bjq' and others

Philip Newton philip.newton at
Wed Aug 3 20:41:12 CEST 2011

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 19:45, Doug Ewell <doug at> wrote:
> I guess you meant "comma."  Although I'm personally a fan of the serial
> comma, and although Section 3.1.5 allows descriptions from core
> standards to be edited "to correct irregularities in formatting (such as
> misspellings, inappropriate apostrophes or other punctuation, or
> excessive or missing spaces)," I don't think this particular case is
> egregious enough to warrant such editing.  Others are welcome to opine
> here.

I agree with you on both points (preferring the serial comma, but that
I wouldn't make the change if the source did not use it).

Philip Newton <philip.newton at>

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list